Текущее время: 28 мар 2024 12:59

Часовой пояс: UTC + 3 часа




Начать новую тему Ответить на тему  [ Сообщений: 3 ] 
Автор Сообщение
 Заголовок сообщения: a few comments
СообщениеДобавлено: 09 авг 2010 13:48 
Не в сети

Зарегистрирован:
09 авг 2010 13:41
Сообщения: 1
Hi,

I came across your product while looking for a new AV solution and I would like to leave a few comments. My first impression is very good, especially the interface: it looks great, is pretty straight forward and not overloaded. I don't need some sort of bloatware, I need an AV that just works, and Nano AV is a pretty good approach to that.

Last Friday I did a quick test with 10 new samples from malwaredomainlist. Nod32 found 7/10, avast 6/10, nanoAV 3/10.
Today I checked the same samples again: Nod32 10/10, avast 9/10, nanoAV 7/10.
Although not being great, I think this result is quite impressive for a beta product.

But the one thing that definitely has to improve is the usage of system resources. 100 MB of memory is far too high, especially when you would like to use it on a low end system (netbook). NanoAV also significantly slows down the boot process: Without any antivirus, my Windows 7 single core with 2 GB RAM boots up in 47 seconds, with NanoAV installed 1:27 min (= almost double, that's too much). With avast installed it takes 1:08 min, that's ok.

One more thing: I would like to always have the newest definitions, so is it possible that NanoAV automatically checks for updates at startup or as soon as an internet connection is available, wihout waiting until the scheduled interval is reached?

And please do not overload your product with features (as I said, there is enough bloatware on the market already). Some kind of web shield would be nice, but I don't need a firewall. I also don't need a mail scanner, but if you are planning to implement one, it would be great if it worked with TLS/SSL connections (otherwise a mail scanner would be useless in my opinion).

For now I'm running NanoAV on a virtual machine for testing purposes. If detection rate and resource usage improve, I'm pretty sure that NanoAV is going to be real competitive. So keep up the good work :)

Best regards,
Kevin


Вернуться к началу
 Профиль  
 
 Заголовок сообщения: Re: a few comments
СообщениеДобавлено: 13 авг 2010 10:18 
NanoAV Team
Аватара пользователя
Не в сети

Зарегистрирован:
27 мар 2009 16:17
Сообщения: 695
Откуда:
Брянск
Hi Kevin,

Thank you for the testing of NANO AntiVirus and your helpful suggestions.


Вернуться к началу
 Профиль  
 
 Заголовок сообщения: Re: a few comments
СообщениеДобавлено: 19 дек 2011 22:05 
Аватара пользователя
Не в сети

Зарегистрирован:
13 ноя 2011 08:07
Сообщения: 58

Награды:

Наш бета-тестер
Kevin писал(а):
Hi,

I came across your product while looking for a new AV solution and I would like to leave a few comments. My first impression is very good, especially the interface: it looks great, is pretty straight forward and not overloaded. I don't need some sort of bloatware, I need an AV that just works, and Nano AV is a pretty good approach to that.

Last Friday I did a quick test with 10 new samples from malwaredomainlist. Nod32 found 7/10, avast 6/10, nanoAV 3/10.
Today I checked the same samples again: Nod32 10/10, avast 9/10, nanoAV 7/10.
Although not being great, I think this result is quite impressive for a beta product.

But the one thing that definitely has to improve is the usage of system resources. 100 MB of memory is far too high, especially when you would like to use it on a low end system (netbook). NanoAV also significantly slows down the boot process: Without any antivirus, my Windows 7 single core with 2 GB RAM boots up in 47 seconds, with NanoAV installed 1:27 min (= almost double, that's too much). With avast installed it takes 1:08 min, that's ok.

One more thing: I would like to always have the newest definitions, so is it possible that NanoAV automatically checks for updates at startup or as soon as an internet connection is available, wihout waiting until the scheduled interval is reached?

And please do not overload your product with features (as I said, there is enough bloatware on the market already). Some kind of web shield would be nice, but I don't need a firewall. I also don't need a mail scanner, but if you are planning to implement one, it would be great if it worked with TLS/SSL connections (otherwise a mail scanner would be useless in my opinion).

For now I'm running NanoAV on a virtual machine for testing purposes. If detection rate and resource usage improve, I'm pretty sure that NanoAV is going to be real competitive. So keep up the good work :)

Best regards,
Kevin


1. Its Memory usage is also high on my PC.
2. I also notice a slowdown when booting my PC that's running Windows 7 and the new beta of NANO AntiVirus.
3. I also agree with your statement of it not being overloaded with features.


Вернуться к началу
 Профиль  
 
Показать сообщения за:  Поле сортировки  
Начать новую тему Ответить на тему  [ Сообщений: 3 ] 

Часовой пояс: UTC + 3 часа


Кто сейчас на конференции

Сейчас этот форум просматривают: нет зарегистрированных пользователей и гости: 1


Вы не можете начинать темы
Вы не можете отвечать на сообщения
Вы не можете редактировать свои сообщения
Вы не можете удалять свои сообщения
Вы не можете добавлять вложения

Найти:
Перейти:  
POWERED_BY
Русская поддержка phpBB